Comments for Kiss, Paul StanleyE-MAIL: Halliburtonl@APSU02.APSU.EDU I've been a Kiss fan most of my life. I had heard that I could get words to the songs. ‹E-MAIL: zephyr@aol.com The worst of the solo releases. Paul Stanley needs KISS more than they need him, the jerk!E-MAIL: bobby.j.pacheco.2@nd.edu paul stanley is a rock god....that's it......that's it againE-MAIL: HvyMtlFan@aol.com Hey, Zephyr! This is the most KISS-like of any of the solos. How can you say it's the worst? The whole purpose of the solo albums was so each of them could get their rocks of by doing their own things and hopefully convince Ace & Peter not to leave the band. The chemistry between the members is what made KISS, not any one personality. Each and every one of the solos is good in its own respect - although Gene's a little unusual. Paul would be Paul without KISS, but KISS could not be KISS without Paul.E-MAIL: dwolters@umich.edu that IS it!! Good ol` rock and roll. Note the mis-wording of track 4on the back of the CD. Classic stuff.berndude@hotmail.com I concur, this is the most Kiss-like of the 1978 solo albums. It is far better than Gene or Peter's. Almost as solid as Ace's. 7/10Comments supplied by users do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Roadkill Consulting, Inc. |
Copyright 1994-2004 Roadkill Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved.